A retina display advertisement gets the bells tolling. This time Apple is at the receiving end. The aftermath is the result an accusation blame game inflicted on Apple by Swiss photographer Sabine Liewald. And we all thought Apple was famous for innovation & their unique ideas? Didn’t we?

Is this Karma serving the Apple contingent?

The picture in reference corresponds to a retina display advertisement that was pressed into service & manipulated by Apple & used beyond permissions as proffered by the photographer. The particularization is referenced with respect to a eye that was ostentatiously displayed out of bounds beyond the permissible limits. The initial permission was allotted to provide a high resolution image only for testing layouts, whereas Apple presented it as a marketing material.

The feature in description is sued by the photographer for the basic rendition for damages against copyright infringement. The story doesn’t end here, judging from the benefit the photographer is also reportedly going for seeking Apple’s profits with respect to this featured image. In this circumstance, trying to take too big of a slice of the pie is gigantic leap against Apple. Aftermath of this dispute, significant trouble can surface upon the photographer when she tries to lay claim to the pointing out accusations.

The photographer’s suing as a result, but not just for damages regarding copyright infringement; she’s also going for a piece of Apple’s profits. It’s that second bit that might be a little contentious. Either way, it looks like this is the second time Apple has ripped off something Swiss, thought this may have just been oversight. Whether the infringement was intentional or not, one thing is for sure: it’s all fun and games until someone loses an eye. [Patently Apple via PetaPixel]

After the Steve Jobs era, there has been notable decline in the efficiency maintained by the same company. Just recently, we have seen notable aspects where Apple has literally copied other people’s works, messed up the maps, as well the other consistent leaks of various apple products that surfaced up several times in spite the double security. There is no concreteness provided as to whether the infringement was intentional. Apple’s tarnishing image gets more eyes now!

You might also like these post :

About Dilbert

As, the comic writer says - Dilbert is actually designed after one person in particular. Interestingly, that person is not aware that he is the model for Dilbert. I'm an eagle-eyed person constantly tracking down the games in the Android Market(Play Store) and also really addicted to playing games on my Droid!! Also supervene Apple news and other ongoing rumours. | Add my circles on Google+ :

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *